Windows vs mac for music production Patch#
Windows vs mac for music production pro#
Windows vs mac for music production Pc#

If you want to see C-Lab in action then check out another Espen Kraft video.Īs I’ve already said, more software came to the Atari offering synth patch editors, some basic sampler/editors and other music related stuff, however in most cases Creator/Notator and Cubase were the stars of the Atari show. Each unit usually consisted of around 8 channels of separate synth sounds, in most cases these also included drum sounds, often residing on MIDI channel 10. However, it wasn't long before some cost effective multitimbral sound expanders came to market The Yamaha FB01 and TX81Z, the Roland MT32 and U110, and later the original Emu Proteus. There were no sounds inside the computer, so owners used MIDI synths and expanders to grow their sound arsenal. To be fair, both were very similar, offering patterns and songs so that the user could build up a song fast. Here’s an excellent video from Espen Kraft showing them in action.ĭepending on who you ask you’ll be told that the software that changed everything for musicians was C-Lab Creator and later on came a more powerful score based version, Notator, or Steinberg Cubase. The information was displayed on small LED or LCD screens which meant a lot of menu hopping, something like wallpapering the hallway through the letterbox.

Windows vs mac for music production pro#

These units were both costly and quite difficult to use. Its no surprise that the MacBook Pro 14-inch (2021) is the top choice for music production, seeing as its also king of best.

There were some hardware sequencers from brands like Roland and Yamaha.

For most mere mortals that meant 4 or 8 tracks, or if you were really wealthy then 16 tracks. Other developers had success too, Passport with Mastertracks Pro and Dr T with KCS, short for Keyboard Controlled Sequencer.įor those too young to remember the state of the market at that time, up until the advent of a machine like the Atari ST, all tracks were recorded on tape, be that cassette or open reel. The two developers that really powered the Atari ST to the forefront were C-Lab, with Creator and Notator (Later Emagic and the forerunner to Logic) and Steinberg, with Pro 24 and later Cubase. There were Apple Macs and Windows PC, but they were costly compared to the Atari ST. The computer is the Atari ST, which came in two versions the 520ST and the 1040ST, both had built in MIDI ports, a MIDI in and out.ĭespite it being a fully fledged computer that could run regular software like word processing, DTP, and games, for the majority of music production owners the Atari ST had one job… the MIDI powerhouse in their studio. Then one computer brand changed everything, it wasn't a Mac or PC! For many we thought this was as good as it got. It started with cassette based machines likes the Tascam 244 and Fostex X15. Off-the-shelf laptops come loaded with bloatware and add-on.

Windows vs mac for music production Pc#

Rewind back to the 1980s and home music production was really starting to take off. Off the shelf laptops from big-box PC makers are not built specifically for music production.